"I tried to click on some text in the page while page was loading, but that didn't help because all text elements are loaded before the whole page finish loading. (Or switch to their Mobile Site if they use a different URL.) That's a Technique I often use. On the other hand, using a Mobile UA could be "a Trick" to fool the Site to switch to some "pure" HTML Content for this Page that will then display in a cleaner and more straightforward Way, that the Browser and iMacros will probably handle much better than all that from JS dynamically generated Content. => Maybe an Idea to (try to) change your UA in WF, either from some FF Add-on, or from your Script using the '!USERAGENT' Command, to force the Site to see WF and your Script as also FF52, or maybe some even later Version, like FF70 or FF77. If the Page and your Script work correctly in FF52, I would expect it/them to work also in WF v2020.06 as WF will be much more recent than FF52.īut.!, I notice in the 2 Browsers I opened this Page (manually), => PM26 + FF55, that the Content/Layout is quite different indeed, the CSS seems to have loaded "more correctly" in PM than in FF, which is a bit surprising, if any Differences, I would have expected them to be the other way around actually, but I get some Horizontal Navigation in PM (about "Your Account > Manage your Account > etc" and the different Amounts), while the Navigation/Display is Vertical in FF.Ĭould be that the Site is trying "to be clever", and displays the Page indeed deliberately differently based on the UA, and while FF52 or FF55 will indeed be correctly identified as FF52 or FF55, I know for PM26 that it very often gets identified as FF24 or FF26 while PM v26.3.3 should be identified as FF47 (if PM absolutely needs to be "converted" to FF), and I wouldn't be surprised if the same happens with WaterFox also on this Site. You didn't mention anything about '!TIMEOUT_PAGE', either in the Script or from the iMacros Global Settings, but I reckon you've "checked that", and you have the same Settings in both Browsers.? Hum, very strange, and very bad Design, probably meant to be not Searchable and not Selectable/Quotable, hum, I already come back from my "they've cleaned a bit of their Mess", pfff.!īut hum, stg not completely clear to me from your Description., does the Page (in WF) load correctly if you load it manually, but your Script doesn't respect '!TIMEOUT_PAGE'.?, while the Tab-Loading Indicator in WF is still spinning.? , even if hum., they seem to have "cleaned a bit" a part of "their Mess" since the last time I had had a Look at the HTML Source of their Site, (more than 1 Year ago actually), or at least for this "Reload" Page, all Content/Scripts are now located on "only" 3 Sites/Servers that they manage themselves, which is good, or at least for the first Level of their Embedded/Cross-Linked/Background JS Scripts, and I may have blocked already some of their Scripts, maybe I don't see the whole Structure.īut OK, a lot of the Content on this Page gets dynamically generated/retrieved from JS, so the Browser doesn't "really" know when all Content has been retrieved and the Page is "ready" for (Post)Processing on User Actions (manually of via iMacros)., and I see on Pale Moon (v26.3.3) that some Section(s) on the Page never get(s) loaded (compared to the same Page opened in FF v55.0.3), => the 5x "Easy Way." + "Consolidate" etc + the FAQ, oh but hum, this whole Content is actually just one '.jpg' Image. One of the Sites with the worst HTML Design I've ever seen. I really don't want to have to start messing with omni.ja as well (because those changes will also get lost on the next update) so I wanted to replace the home page tab icon using CSS instead, but I can't get it to work.ĭoes anybody know the correct css to use? Thanks.Browser1= Waterfox-Portable Classic 2020.06(64-bit)įouff.!, '', oops-oops-oops., poor you!, ah-ah.! exe resource replacement method, but the icon on the Waterfox about:home page tab hasn't changed (because that icon is coming from the css url However, when I clicked my saved link recently, all the comments under the blog post had gone, and now I can't remember the method that was mentioned. I seem to recall that the reason I saved the link was specifically because the method stated did not involve resource hacking, and so the change would therefore stay in place across upgrades. Several moths ago I saved a link to a Waterfox blog post that contained a user's comment about how to change the Waterfox icon to something else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |